Key Takeaways
- The FDA issued warning letters to several sunscreen brands for using unapproved foam and whipped formats, citing mislabeling concerns.
- A recent study revealed hidden UV filters in popular sunscreens, raising safety and compliance issues.
- Experts call for updated regulations to ensure transparency and consumer safety amid evolving sunscreen formulations.
Regulatory Scrutiny of Sunscreen Products
In recent weeks, sunscreen safety has gained attention due to two major developments. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sent warning letters to several brands, including Supergoop! and Vacation Inc., regarding their unapproved foam and whipped sunscreen formats. This action highlighted the importance of compliance with FDA regulations, as these products do not fall under the accepted dosage forms outlined in the Over-the-Counter (OTC) Monograph M020, which includes only specific designs like oil, lotion, and cream.
Vacation Inc.’s packaging, resembling whipped cream containers, has drawn particular concern for potentially misleading consumers and posing a risk of accidental ingestion. As per the FDA, only established product formats are permissible without requiring new drug application approvals, thus making these newer formats misbranded.
Industry Experts Weigh In
Commenting on the FDA’s actions, industry expert Kelly Dobos noted that concerns around the application and effectiveness of active ingredients in foam sunscreens are valid. She pointed out the challenges related to dosage and testing methods for these unconventional formats, suggesting the FDA needs to reevaluate existing regulations to adapt to modern sunscreen innovations.
This sentiment resonates with other experts, who argue that the regulatory framework needs to evolve to address the proliferation of new sunscreen technologies while prioritizing consumer safety and preventative health measures against skin cancer.
Study Reveals Hidden Ingredients
On August 17, 2025, the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (JAAD) reported on a study analyzing 150 popular sunscreens, identifying mysterious UV filter chemicals not listed on product labels. Although full details of the study aren’t yet available, initial findings indicated that several sunscreens contained undisclosed ingredients like butyloctyl salicylate, which is not approved as a sunscreen by the FDA.
Butyloctyl salicylate is known to enhance the efficacy of other UV filters but does not meet FDA standards for being labeled as a sunscreen product due to insufficient SPF contribution on its own. The presence of these hidden ingredients poses significant safety concerns, as consumers may unknowingly use products with unregulated chemicals.
Sunscreen ‘Doping’ Concerns
The usage of hidden UV filters raises the question of “sunscreen doping,” a term popularized by the brand Pavise. Doping refers to the practice of including unapproved filters in products marketed as ‘100% mineral’ sunscreens, enabling formulators to enhance protection without disclosing the additional chemicals. While these hidden filters can improve product texture and performance, they pose a risk to consumer safety since they haven’t undergone rigorous regulatory scrutiny.
Of the 150 products investigated, about 30 contained undisclosed ingredients, challenging the integrity of ‘mineral only’ claims.
Implications for Sunscreen Formulators
These circumstances highlight the crucial responsibilities of sunscreen manufacturers to ensure compliance with evolving regulations and to maintain transparency concerning active ingredients. The emergence of new formulations and the issue of undisclosed active components suggest a need for updating the regulatory monograph standards to safeguard consumer health. As innovation in the sunscreen market continues, the lessons from these developments stress that both safety compliance and transparency are essential to protect consumers and foster effective product development.
The content above is a summary. For more details, see the source article.
